Texas Construction Law Updates
Challenges to overall enforceability of a contract can be determined by an arbitratorJP Neyland - Tuesday, October 17, 2017
The parties to a dispute entered into an informal written settlement agreement, which contemplated execution of a more-formal settlement agreement later. The informal settlement agreement stated that “any disagreement result[ing] from negotiation and completion of this documentation” would be submitted to arbitration. One party argued the informal settlement agreement was wholly unenforceable because it was not approved by that party’s Board of Directors.
The court of appeals analyzed whether the arbitrator or the trial court should decide whether the entire informal settlement agreement was enforceable. The parties’ dispute concerned a challenge to the enforceability of the entire contract, rather than a challenge specifically to the arbitration provision. Under these circumstances, the court held that the arbitrator should decide whether the contract is enforceable.
It seems rather ironic that the parties are required to use the arbitration process, as set forth in the agreement, to determine whether the agreement (which contains the arbitration clause) is indeed enforceable. On the other hand, if a party challenged only the enforceability of the arbitration clause (but not the enforceability of the entire contract), most cases have held that a court should decide that dispute.
Human Biostar, Inc. v. Celltex Therapeutics Corp. , 514 S.W.3d 844 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 19, 2017, pet. denied).
The attached information is general in nature, is presented for discussion purposes only, and may not reflect current legal developments, nor fully explore all potential areas of this topic. The information included should not be relied upon or construed as legal advice and is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. No legal representation is undertaken or implied with the distribution of this information.
- Insurance claims can be denied completely unless the owner or contractor can show how much damage resulted from causes covered under the policy
- Liquidated-damage provision enforced by Houston Court of Appeals
- Texas Supreme Court refuses to look beyond the contract language to determine a party’s obligations
- 2017 Legislative Updates
- Construction contracts can incorporate documents executed by the parties without describing them with specificity
- Partial performance can overcome the absence of a written contract
- Arbitration agreement found unenforceable because employer could modify it without advance notice to the employee
- Challenges to overall enforceability of a contract can be determined by an arbitrator
- Failure to investigate contractor’s performance may prevent an owner from later recovering damages for latent defects
- Pay attention to the signature block and guaranty provisions when signing a contract
- Arbitration (2)
- Condition Precedent (1)
- Construction Contracts (5)
- Construction Defects (1)
- Employment Contracts (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- Government Contracts (1)
- Guaranty Agreement (1)
- Indemnity (1)
- Individual Liability (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Legislative Update (1)
- Limitations (1)
- Notice of Claim (1)
- Real-Estate Contracts (1)
- Settlement Agreements (2)
- Trust Fund Act (1)